From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C99A67A2E for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 13:28:21 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 22:28:08 -0500 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.6.18] U4 DART improvements Message-ID: <20060603032808.GE28528@pb15.lixom.net> References: <20060602040426.GA28528@pb15.lixom.net> <61e1e9d0ada7e9648b8590cfac2b67b9@kernel.crashing.org> <1149295238.7972.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1149295238.7972.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Olof Johansson Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:40:38AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > In fact I doubt we need a barrier at all... Yeah, I'm not sure what I was thinking. There's need for a barrier before the invalidation to make sure that a stale entry doesn't get re-entered into the TLB, and it's already done before the call. I have no good explanation for why I added that one. I'll respin, test and repost the patch tomorrow. -Olof