From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rune.pobox.com (rune.pobox.com [208.210.124.79]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9336767B5A for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 03:33:51 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:33:26 -0500 From: Nathan Lynch To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powersave_nap cleanup Message-ID: <20060609173326.GA8934@localdomain> References: <20060526140227.GE8934@localdomain> <17545.15326.767523.342562@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <17545.15326.767523.342562@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul Mackerras wrote: > Nathan Lynch writes: > > > Rename machdep_calls.power_save to machdep_calls.powersave_nap to make > > more apparent the connection with the powersave_nap sysctl. > > Hmmm, it's possibly a bit confusing to have a variable and a function > with the same name... Heh, I thought you had suggested doing that, maybe I misunderstood. So, what to do? Leave the machdep_calls.power_save name as it is?