linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove extra local_bh_disable/enable from arch do_softirq
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:08:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060627100856.GA17160@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17566.32236.368906.227113@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>


* Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:

> At the moment, powerpc and s390 have their own versions of do_softirq 
> which include local_bh_disable() and __local_bh_enable() calls.  They 
> end up calling __do_softirq (in kernel/softirq.c) which also does 
> local_bh_disable/enable.
> 
> Apparently the two levels of disable/enable trigger a warning from 
> some validation code that Ingo is working on, and he would like to see 
> the outer level removed.  But to do that, we have to move the 
> account_system_vtime calls that are currently in the arch do_softirq() 
> implementations for powerpc and s390 into the generic __do_softirq() 
> (this is a no-op for other archs because account_system_vtime is 
> defined to be an empty inline function on all other archs).  This 
> patch does that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

thanks - this solves the problem nicely.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-27 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-25 12:13 [PATCH] Remove extra local_bh_disable/enable from arch do_softirq Paul Mackerras
2006-06-27 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-06-27 11:43 ` Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060627100856.GA17160@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).