From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 08:07:58 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc: Instrument Hypervisor Calls Message-ID: <20060715220757.GA31511@krispykreme> References: <20060714233739.GA11487@monkey.ibm.com> <200607150200.03494.arnd@arndb.de> <20060715153053.GK31081@krispykreme> <200607151842.27568.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200607151842.27568.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Bryan Rosenburg , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Nathan Lynch , Paul Mackerras , Christopher Yeoh List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Not sure I follow you. I would expect the PURR value to be restored after > a context switch, even if we continue on a different physical CPU. > > The idea behind monitoring both PURR and timebase is that the difference > between the two tells you how long the partition was suspended during > the hcall. Sounds good, last time I looked at the patch I thought it was gathering the PURR only. That on its own would make for some confusing results. Anton