From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (e2.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e2.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B28467B56 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:14:50 +1000 (EST) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6VJEjrt008450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:14:46 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id k6VJ6Gkc275330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:13:04 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k6VIv300027883 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:57:03 -0600 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:57:02 -0500 To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove bogomips from /proc/cpuinfo Message-ID: <20060731185702.GF4453@austin.ibm.com> References: <20060731125904.GA1997@suse.de> <200607311946.18331.arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com> <20060731174924.GA4273@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackeras , Arnd Bergmann , Olaf Hering List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:17:05PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Olaf Hering writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >> On Monday 31 July 2006 14:59, Olaf Hering wrote: > >> > Remove bogomips from /proc/cpuinfo. > >> > It is now really bogus since "timebase-frequency" is shown. > >> > >> Well, but it's still part of the ABI, right? > >> How do you determine that there are no broken applications > >> still relying on it? > > > > Everything works on a G5, as example. Alpha doesnt have it either. > > What pratical value had bogomips for an application? > > What harm does it do? Kernel bloat. --linas