From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [63.81.120.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA081679A6 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:31:23 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 17:35:04 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" To: Matthew McClintock Subject: Re: RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources? Message-ID: <20060802003504.GA20439@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <1154464346.19994.4.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> <1154466094.11069.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1154466094.11069.6.camel@localhost> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:01:33PM -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:00 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > Mark A. Greer in his patch to port sandpoint to arch/powerpc put > > sandpoint.dts under arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sandpoint.dts > > I believe in his latest patches he removed this part. The device trees > were not included at all and he left this point open for discussion. That's correct. TBH, I think its wrong to keep them in the kernel source at all--yes, the same argument could be made for arch/powerpc/boot but that's been settled. We already have dtc kept externally to the kernel source. Why not keep a single site where all things necessary to powerpc linux are kept? It could house dtc, the dt attach tool, and all the dt source files. I doesn't matter to me where as long as its highly available and has reasonable bandwidth. jdl.com? source.mvista.com? penguinppc.org? other? Mark