From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:31:42 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" To: Tom Rini Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] bootwrapper: Add support for the DINK firmware Message-ID: <20060802183142.GK17652@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <20060719231421.GF3887@mag.az.mvista.com> <20060802161934.GI3075@smtp.west.cox.net> <20060802181422.GG17652@mag.az.mvista.com> <20060802181514.GO3075@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20060802181514.GO3075@smtp.west.cox.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:15:14AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:14:22AM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:19:34AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:14:21PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > > > > > > > This patch adds the firmware operations that support the DINK firmware > > > > from Freescale. > > > > > > This isn't really DINK support (which would mean actually talking > > > back/with DINK, > > > > You seem to be thinking that this is the final, end-all solution to > > everything. It isn't. Its a step in the direction that we are trying > > go (IIUC). dink.c is about the easiest one there will be. of.c has a > > slightly more complicated fw_ops. We still need to figure out what uboot > > needs and what PIBS needs and what... > > Right. I'm just saying that unless you're planning on making this talk > with / use DINK (I swear, the DINK manual talks about this a bit, but > I'm too lazy to look just this second), this isn't the DINK one, this is > the (will be needed and used) bare metal one. Ah, okay. Sure.