From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Matthew McClintock <msm@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New target 'cuImage' - compatibility uImage
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:33:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060802223302.9667135360F@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:59:06 CDT." <1154552346.5550.51.camel@localhost>
In message <1154552346.5550.51.camel@localhost> you wrote:
>
> And the new cuImage will look like this:
>
> -------------------------------------
> - compressed uImage - -
> - ------------------------------- - -
> - - _start - - -
> - - boot wrapper code - - -
> - - ----------------------------- - -
> - - - device tree - - -
> - - ----------------------------- - -
> - - ----------------------------- - -
> - - - - - -
> - - - UNcompressed - - -
> - - - kernel image - - -
> - - - - - -
> - - ----------------------------- - -
> - --------------------------------- -
> -------------------------------------
Please explain.
In my understanding, an "uImage" file is a image consisting of an
U-Boot header (64 bytes) followed by an (compressed or uncompressed)
Linux kernel image.
So what do you mean by "compressed uImage"? If you take an "uImage"
file according to above definition and compress it, it will not be
recognized by U-Boot.
And why do you need a second, "UNcompressed kernel image" in your
setup? I must be missing something, because including *two* kernel
images makes no sense to me, and I don't understand why you would
want to insist of an "UNcompressed" image...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
1st Old Man: Gee, its windy today.
2nd Old Man: No it's not... it's Thursday.
3rd Old Man: Yeh, me too. Let's go for a beer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-02 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-02 20:59 [RFC] New target 'cuImage' - compatibility uImage Matthew McClintock
2006-08-02 22:33 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2006-08-03 11:38 ` Li Yang-r58472
2006-08-03 15:29 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 15:56 ` Li Yang
2006-08-03 16:02 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 16:17 ` Li Yang
2006-08-03 16:24 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 16:47 ` Li Yang
2006-08-03 20:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-08-03 20:20 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 20:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-08-03 20:40 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 20:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-08-03 19:37 ` Mark A. Greer
2006-08-03 20:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-08-03 20:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-08-03 20:12 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 20:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-08-03 20:31 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 0:30 ` Tom Rini
2006-08-03 15:24 ` Matthew McClintock
2006-08-03 11:47 ` Li Yang-r58472
2006-08-03 15:30 ` Matthew McClintock
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-03 9:29 Milton Miller
2006-08-03 18:17 Milton Miller
2006-08-03 18:53 ` Matthew McClintock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060802223302.9667135360F@atlas.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=msm@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).