From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2CB67B70 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:04:14 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:00:13 -0500 To: Linas Vepstas Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4]: powerpc/cell spidernet ethtool -i version number info. Message-ID: <20060811180013.GB6550@pb15.lixom.net> References: <20060811170337.GH10638@austin.ibm.com> <20060811171117.GL10638@austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20060811171117.GL10638@austin.ibm.com> From: Olof Johansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, James K Lewis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jens Osterkamp List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:11:17PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote: > This patch adds version information as reported by > ethtool -i to the Spidernet driver. Why does a driver that's in the mainline kernel need to have a version number besides the kernel version? I can understand it for drivers like e1000 that Intel maintain outside of the kernel as well. But spidernet is a fully mainline maintained driver, right? -Olof