From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rune.pobox.com (rune.pobox.com [208.210.124.79]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE85567B56 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:26:58 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:26:49 -0500 From: Nathan Lynch To: Jan-Bernd Themann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ehea: pHYP interface Message-ID: <20060811212649.GN3233@localdomain> References: <44D99F1A.4080905@de.ibm.com> <20060811211915.GL3233@localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20060811211915.GL3233@localdomain> Cc: Thomas Klein , netdev , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Nathan Lynch wrote: > Hope all the callers of this function are in non-atomic context (but I > wasn't able to find any callers?). Never mind, I somehow missed the users of ehea_hcall_9arg_9ret in this patch, sorry.