From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:46:50 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" To: Hollis Blanchard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] bootwrapper: arch/powerpc/boot code reorg patches Message-ID: <20060818214649.GA30418@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <20060719225356.GA3887@mag.az.mvista.com> <20060808191450.GA10108@mag.az.mvista.com> <1155670626.6338.3.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1155670626.6338.3.camel@basalt.austin.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:37:06PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:14 -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > > Just a note that I will respin my patches to address all of your > > comments. However, it looks like the fdt code is going to change > > to use code from a common source base. I'm going to wait until > > that has settled and then I'll modify the code and repost the patches. > > By the way, I don't expect the (ft_build.h) interface to change much > from what I emailed last week. So I think it's safe to build on top of > those. > > The only addition I'd like to make is creating an ft_set_prop() that > will handle resizing the tree for you. With that change, you wouldn't > ft_get_prop() and then write directly to that pointer (as is done > currently). > > I'm still waiting to hear the outcome of Matt's patches. I don't need > them, but if u-boot does then I'll have to merge them into the > standalone code. Another note. Hollis and I have been talking some more and may change some code. IOW, I'm still going to wait a bit to see what comes out of it before respining the patches. Mark