From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mporter@embeddedalley.com>
Received: from matthew-porters-computer.local (cpe-088197.static.wadsnet.net
	[65.114.88.197]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5784A67BC3
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:27:03 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:26:53 -0400
From: Matt Porter <mporter@embeddedalley.com>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Start arch/powerpc/boot code reorganization
Message-ID: <20060921142653.GA20971@matthew-porters-computer.local>
References: <17680.30367.157642.674242@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
	<20060920012042.GA28489@mag.az.mvista.com>
	<1158721828.3043.13.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org>
	<A6FD3E5E-94EF-4E12-A0FB-8700F0DF8151@kernel.crashing.org>
	<1158787957.6002.307.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20060920215738.GC24809@mag.az.mvista.com>
	<C2AFCB31-CFC2-4B0E-ADAE-380A612D1053@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20060921133707.GA29137@gate.crashing.org>
	<E1GQPKk-0003y1-Uq@jdl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <E1GQPKk-0003y1-Uq@jdl.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:15:22AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day Matt Porter mumbled:
> > 
> > Since the address prop sounds
> > like it will confuse some people I think it makes sense to add a
> > new property (might as well just throw out the spec :P).
> 
> Ayyyy, mate.  She be not so much a "code" as she be a "guideline".
 
Yeah, yeah, of course. We only use it when convenient.

> Huh?  That was the other day?  Neeeveeer mind.

:)

-Matt