From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e34.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5585767B9F for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:50:22 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8MNoJMv005362 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:50:19 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id k8MNoIpe215222 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:50:18 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k8MNoIHu007003 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:50:18 -0600 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:50:17 -0500 To: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI Error Recovery: Symbios SCSI device driver Message-ID: <20060922235017.GD14213@austin.ibm.com> References: <20060921231314.GW29167@austin.ibm.com> <20060922220629.GA4600@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <20060922233235.GB14213@austin.ibm.com> <20060922163929.bb870ee1.rdunlap@xenotime.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20060922163929.bb870ee1.rdunlap@xenotime.net> From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Luca , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:39:29PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:32:35 -0500 Linas Vepstas wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:06:29AM +0200, Luca wrote: > > > > > > Space after function name? You put in other places too, it's not > > > consistent with the rest of the patch. > > > > Oops. I was also coding on a different project recently, with a > > different style. I'll send a revised patch in a moment. > > Please change if()'s to use > > if (var == constant) > instead of > if (constant == var) Yuck! Horrid coding style! No rational excuse for coding like that. Advice taken under protest; new patch shortly. --linas