From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2309967CBD for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:24:13 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 02:24:05 +0400 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Jerry Van Baren Subject: Re: Please pull upstream branch of linux-2.6-PQ.git... Message-ID: <20061004022405.45e26c26@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <4522BC0F.7060001@smiths-aerospace.com> References: <20061003223054.06e25136@localhost.localdomain> <4522BC0F.7060001@smiths-aerospace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig___tyViavx+ARrap6WBByZ5f; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Sig___tyViavx+ARrap6WBByZ5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:37:51 -0400 Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Vitaly Bordug wrote: > > Paul, > >=20 > > Please do a pull from > >=20 > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vitb/linux-2.6-PQ.git, > > upstream branch. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug > >=20 > >=20 > > To receive the updated 8272 addition to the arch/powerpc. > > All the comments have been addressed, and it has a minor bugfix > > addressed too in order to make both pq2 and pq3 co-exist happily in > > fsl_soc.c. CPM PIC now has "compatible" property that could be > > "CPM2" or "CPM1" for PQ/8xx. > >=20 > > I think it should go to rc1, because relevant stuff in ppc/ is more > > or less broken now, with new irq engine.=20 >=20 > Hi Vitaly, >=20 > I've been following your -PQ progress with a lot of interest. I have > a PQ2FADS board (8272) and your changes should apply to it too. I > pulled a copy of your repository last week and had a couple of minor > build errors. I made a couple of minor fixes and it built OK but I > didn't run it - I need a compatible boot loader, which leads into my > question... >=20 > What are you using for booting your 8272ADS board? I have been using=20 > u-boot with the "bd" structure but am looking to switch to the > flattened OF tree. I made a half-hearted attempt to switch my u-boot > build to the flattened OF tree but it didn't work and then I got > distracted by other things instead of debugging it. :-( >=20 Well I use latest u-boot + OF patches submitted to the u-boot list+ couple = of minor fixes on top. I was about to set up git repo for Wolfgang to pull, meanwhile there are a = couple of existing trees you may want to take a look: on http://www.jdl.com and http://opensou= rce.freescale.com . Both are holding uboot trees with OF additions, but are targeted to specifi= c platforms apparently (and waiting to be merged too). I'll keep you posted while get the stuff available. -- -Vitaly --Sig___tyViavx+ARrap6WBByZ5f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFIuMGuOg9JvQhSEsRAuEsAJ9qwEakF65g2IGJl6j2JoiHdk26ywCfZtQf 09skofQulLndig7eP+StumM= =p9ZW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig___tyViavx+ARrap6WBByZ5f--