From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ebshome.net (gate.ebshome.net [208.106.21.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gate.ebshome.net", Issuer "gate.ebshome.net" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD54B67DA7 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:31:20 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:31:18 -0700 From: Eugene Surovegin To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] Add MPC8360EMDS board support Message-ID: <20061005063118.GC1985@gate.ebshome.net> References: <4879B0C6C249214CBE7AB04453F84E4D19D865@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net> <20060927165556.04c8d5d7@vitb.ru.mvista.com> <20060927112201.293fef44@localhost.localdomain> <1159942128.13323.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <7BD0D5CE-7BA3-43DC-B972-B75672F6A31E@embeddedalley.com> <1160005019.5887.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061005062105.GA1985@gate.ebshome.net> <1160029594.22232.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1160029594.22232.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:26:34PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 23:21 -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:36:59AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Ugh ? Look at the #ifdef mess in ibm_emac... > > > > Ugh? > > > > I think you have to thank IBM/AMCC designers which keep changing bit > > layout of some registers, sometimes just changing polarity for no > > reason. > > > > And with all due respect, Ben. Current ibm_emac despite of all "mess" > > is actually usable in production environment, which cannot be said > > about initial Armin version and second version you started but never > > got time to actually finish. > > That second version was working fine... on the limited available > variations of EMAC back then. No it wasn't. If it were I would have never wasted my time re-writing this driver. -- Eugene