* [PATCH] Update MTFSF_L() comment
@ 2006-10-05 16:54 Anton Blanchard
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2006-10-05 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: dwmw2, paulus
David Woodhouse points out that the comment accompanying the MTFSF_L
macro is misleading. We should make it clear that the L bit is ignored
on older CPUS, not the entire instruction.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h
index 3a9fcc1..8fb9681 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ #endif
/*
* An mtfsf instruction with the L bit set. On CPUs that support this a
- * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs it is ignored.
+ * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs the L bit is ignored.
*
* Until binutils gets the new form of mtfsf, hardwire the instruction.
*/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-10-05 16:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-05 16:54 [PATCH] Update MTFSF_L() comment Anton Blanchard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).