From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 02:54:07 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH] Update MTFSF_L() comment Message-ID: <20061005165407.GA19972@krispykreme> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse points out that the comment accompanying the MTFSF_L macro is misleading. We should make it clear that the L bit is ignored on older CPUS, not the entire instruction. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard --- diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h index 3a9fcc1..8fb9681 100644 --- a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ #endif /* * An mtfsf instruction with the L bit set. On CPUs that support this a - * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs it is ignored. + * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs the L bit is ignored. * * Until binutils gets the new form of mtfsf, hardwire the instruction. */