From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rdcorle@yahoo.com>
Received: from web56304.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56304.mail.re3.yahoo.com
	[216.252.110.228]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B270B67C48
	for <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>;
	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:15:07 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <20061012161505.28394.qmail@web56304.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: robert corley <rdcorle@yahoo.com>
Subject: plb_temac, EDK 8.1 et al
To: Rick Moleres <rick.moleres@xilinx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List
	<linuxppc-embedded.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Rick;=0A=0AThanks so much for the reply.=0A=0AAs I understand your email=0A=
=0AEDK 7.1 vs. EDK 8.1=0A    gets the *best* plb_temac I need to upgrade th=
e EDK,=0A    I can stick with 7.1 if I am satisfied with the lower performa=
nce,=0A    MVL drivers in source tree of EDK (sw/Thirdparty...)=0A=0Alinux =
2.4 vs. linux 2.6=0A    plb_temac drivers already done=0A    plb_temac avai=
lable in 2.4 via use of xilinx_gige directory=0A=0A-cy=0A