From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (chilli.pcug.org.au [203.10.76.44])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E666867C2A
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:43:06 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (ta-1-1.tip.net.au [203.11.71.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by smtps.tip.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E53A3684CD
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:43:06 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:42:59 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: consolidate feature fixup code
Message-Id: <20061014114259.0cf258ed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20061013115457.7b36a7c3@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1160726663.4792.222.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20061013115457.7b36a7c3@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg="PGP-SHA1";
	boundary="Signature=_Sat__14_Oct_2006_11_42_59_+1000_n+N2saTf.D.C92Hv"
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

--Signature=_Sat__14_Oct_2006_11_42_59_+1000_n+N2saTf.D.C92Hv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Olof,

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:54:57 -0500 Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>
... lots of stuff deleted ...

Could you please trim your replies to just areasonable amount of context,
please. You are not the only one who is at fault here, but yours was the
example that came my way just as I needed to point out the problem.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

--Signature=_Sat__14_Oct_2006_11_42_59_+1000_n+N2saTf.D.C92Hv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFMECpFdBgD/zoJvwRAimwAKCe9jgj51Cd+TYMPH9f0aQI7bHeWACfShli
77POoXnKddjYkNPWKAk3BBw=
=ggrH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sat__14_Oct_2006_11_42_59_+1000_n+N2saTf.D.C92Hv--