From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu (mx2.mail.elte.hu [157.181.151.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B8E67C13 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:41:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:33:18 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Daniel Walker Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] powerpc update Message-ID: <20061018143318.GB25141@elte.hu> References: <20061003155358.756788000@dwalker1.mvista.com> <20061018072858.GA29576@elte.hu> <1161181941.23082.32.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1161181941.23082.32.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Daniel Walker wrote: > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 09:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > Pay close attention to the fasteoi interrupt threading. I added usage > > > of mask/unmask instead of using level handling, which worked well on > > > PPC. > > > > this is wrong - it should be doing mask+ack. > > The main reason I did it this way is cause the current threaded eoi > expected the line to be masked. So if you happen to have a eoi that's > threaded you get a warning then the interrupt hangs. does that in fact happen on -rt6? If yes, could you send the warning that is produced? Ingo