From: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
To: kalle.pokki@iki.fi
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPM_UART: Fix non-console initialisation
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:14:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061019231455.0ea159e1@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.61.0610191525580.318096@kosh.hut.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4149 bytes --]
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:31:10 +0300 (EEST)
kalle.pokki@iki.fi wrote:
> If there is a frame buffer console, the cpm_uart_init_portdesc()
> function is never called in the compat mode. Also, the set_lineif()
> method is not called in the compat mode.
>
for the fbconsole case, I agree we do have to address it. But not the proposed way.
See below.
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Pokki <kalle.pokki@iki.fi>
> ---
> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart.h | 2 +-
> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c | 9 ++++-----
> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c | 6 +++++-
> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c | 6 +++++-
> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart.h
> b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart.h index 3b35cb7..19a6ffe 100644
> --- a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart.h
> +++ b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ extern struct uart_cpm_port cpm_uart_por
>
> /* these are located in their respective files */
> void cpm_line_cr_cmd(int line, int cmd);
> -int cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void);
> +int __init cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void);
> int cpm_uart_allocbuf(struct uart_cpm_port *pinfo, unsigned int
> is_con); void cpm_uart_freebuf(struct uart_cpm_port *pinfo);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
> b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c index 8f3b3e5..895f2f1
> 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
> @@ -1349,11 +1349,8 @@ static int cpm_uart_init(void) {
> pr_info("cpm_uart: WARNING: no UART devices found
> on platform bus!\n"); pr_info(
> "cpm_uart: the driver will guess configuration, but
> this mode is no longer supported.\n"); -#ifndef
> CONFIG_SERIAL_CPM_CONSOLE
> - ret = cpm_uart_init_portdesc();
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -#endif
> +
> + cpm_uart_init_portdesc();
>
And we end up with init_portdesc called unconditionally? this would likely break, or at least confuse the
code, that uses platform dev to pass resources offsets.
> cpm_reg.nr = cpm_uart_nr;
> ret = uart_register_driver(&cpm_reg);
> @@ -1365,6 +1362,8 @@ #endif
> int con = cpm_uart_port_map[i];
> cpm_uart_ports[con].port.line = i;
> cpm_uart_ports[con].port.flags =
> UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF;
> + if (cpm_uart_ports[con].set_lineif)
> +
> cpm_uart_ports[con].set_lineif(&cpm_uart_ports[con]);
> uart_add_one_port(&cpm_reg, &cpm_uart_ports[con].port); }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c
> b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c index 95afc37..6f04a9f
> 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c
> @@ -184,10 +184,14 @@ void cpm_uart_freebuf(struct uart_cpm_po
> }
>
> /* Setup any dynamic params in the uart desc */
> -int cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void)
> +int __init cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void)
> {
> pr_debug("CPM uart[-]:init portdesc\n");
>
> + /* Don't run this again, if the console driver did it
> already */
> + if (cpm_uart_nr > 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> cpm_uart_nr = 0;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_CPM_SMC1
> cpm_uart_ports[UART_SMC1].smcp = &cpmp->cp_smc[0];
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c
> b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c index ef3bb47..0f21543
> 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c
> @@ -252,10 +252,14 @@ void cpm_uart_freebuf(struct uart_cpm_po
> }
>
> /* Setup any dynamic params in the uart desc */
> -int cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void)
> +int __init cpm_uart_init_portdesc(void)
> {
> pr_debug("CPM uart[-]:init portdesc\n");
>
> + /* Don't run this again, if the console driver did it
> already */
> + if (cpm_uart_nr > 0)
> + return 0;
> +
Personally, I don't care much of compat stuff, unless it is breaking/confusing targets
using proper resources...
> cpm_uart_nr = 0;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_CPM_SMC1
> cpm_uart_ports[UART_SMC1].smcp = (smc_t *) &
> cpm2_immr->im_smc[0];
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-19 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-19 12:31 [PATCH] CPM_UART: Fix non-console initialisation kalle.pokki
2006-10-19 19:14 ` Vitaly Bordug [this message]
2006-10-19 19:40 ` Kalle Pokki
2006-10-19 19:51 ` Vitaly Bordug
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061019231455.0ea159e1@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=kalle.pokki@iki.fi \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox