linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Mohan Kumar M <mohan@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, fastboot@lists.osdl.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix for interrupt distribution
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:17:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061030181751.GI17168@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061030180446.GA24307@in.ibm.com>

Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> When kdump kernel is booted with the parameter "maxcpus=1" on a threaded
> CPU, we faced some interrupt routing problems.
> 
> In the xics initialization code, "reg" property in each cpu node
> (device-tree/cpus/PowerPC,POWER5@x) is used to match the current boot
> cpu id and based on that "default_server" and "default_distrib_server"
> are calculated. This condition will always meet when OF chooses CPU0 as
> boot cpu or crash happenes on any cpu whose id is any physical cpu id.
> 
> The "reg" property in cpu node gives the id of the cpu and this cpu node
> is created only for physical cpus (not for logical/threaded cpus). The
> code compares the "reg" value to the current boot cpu id and if it
> matches then only it reads "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" and assigns the
> last value of it (which is usually 0xff) to default_distrib_server. So
> when a crash occurs on CPU 3, it will not be able to match the condition
> and thus default_distrib_server is left as zero only. This makes all
> interrupts routed to cpu 0 but cpu 0 is not up because of "maxcpus=1"
> parameter.
> 
> To overcome this, I have just added one more condition to check the
> above condition. I have attached the patch also. Patch is generated over
> 2.6.19-rc3.
> 
> One more idea will be instead of using "reg" property in each cpu node,
> can we use "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" to determine the distribution
> server? "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" format is (please correct
> if I am wrong) 
> 	phys_cpu_id distrib_server logical_cpu_id distrib_server

Firmware has no notion of Linux's logical cpu numbering.


> In a Dual core SMT enabled system, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" will
> be: 
> 
> 	00000002 000000ff 00000003 000000ff
> 	 ^ phys cpu id
>         	  ^ distribution server
>                 	      ^ logical cpu id
>                         	       ^ distribution server
> 
> Tested on POWER5 box.
> 
> Since POWER4 does not have SMT, crash can happen on any CPU and kdump
> kernel can boot with "maxcpus=1" without any problem.
> 
> 
> 
> Allow any cpu to become boot cpu.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar M <mohan@in.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
> Index: test/linux-2.6.19-rc3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> ===================================================================
> --- test.orig/linux-2.6.19-rc3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> +++ test/linux-2.6.19-rc3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> @@ -687,7 +687,8 @@ void __init xics_init_IRQ(void)
>  	     np;
>  	     np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "cpu")) {
>  		ireg = get_property(np, "reg", &ilen);
> -		if (ireg && ireg[0] == get_hard_smp_processor_id(boot_cpuid)) {
> +		if (ireg && ((ireg[0] == get_hard_smp_processor_id(boot_cpuid))
> +		  || (ireg[0] == get_hard_smp_processor_id(boot_cpuid) - 1))) {
>  			ireg = get_property(np,
>  					"ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s", &ilen);
>  			i = ilen / sizeof(int);

NAK

We can't assume any arithmetic relationship between the
"hard"/platform thread ids; it's completely unspecified.  I bet this
patch happens to work on your system but will fail on others.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-30 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-30 18:04 [RFC] Fix for interrupt distribution Mohan Kumar M
2006-10-30 18:17 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-10-31 11:05   ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-06 22:46     ` Nathan Lynch
2006-11-16 12:56       ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-16 15:36         ` Anton Blanchard
2006-11-17  4:57           ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-17 12:12           ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-29  9:10             ` [PATCH] " Mohan Kumar M

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061030181751.GI17168@localdomain \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).