From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Mohan Kumar M <mohan@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, fastboot@lists.osdl.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix for interrupt distribution
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:17:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061030181751.GI17168@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061030180446.GA24307@in.ibm.com>
Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When kdump kernel is booted with the parameter "maxcpus=1" on a threaded
> CPU, we faced some interrupt routing problems.
>
> In the xics initialization code, "reg" property in each cpu node
> (device-tree/cpus/PowerPC,POWER5@x) is used to match the current boot
> cpu id and based on that "default_server" and "default_distrib_server"
> are calculated. This condition will always meet when OF chooses CPU0 as
> boot cpu or crash happenes on any cpu whose id is any physical cpu id.
>
> The "reg" property in cpu node gives the id of the cpu and this cpu node
> is created only for physical cpus (not for logical/threaded cpus). The
> code compares the "reg" value to the current boot cpu id and if it
> matches then only it reads "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" and assigns the
> last value of it (which is usually 0xff) to default_distrib_server. So
> when a crash occurs on CPU 3, it will not be able to match the condition
> and thus default_distrib_server is left as zero only. This makes all
> interrupts routed to cpu 0 but cpu 0 is not up because of "maxcpus=1"
> parameter.
>
> To overcome this, I have just added one more condition to check the
> above condition. I have attached the patch also. Patch is generated over
> 2.6.19-rc3.
>
> One more idea will be instead of using "reg" property in each cpu node,
> can we use "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" to determine the distribution
> server? "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" format is (please correct
> if I am wrong)
> phys_cpu_id distrib_server logical_cpu_id distrib_server
Firmware has no notion of Linux's logical cpu numbering.
> In a Dual core SMT enabled system, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s" will
> be:
>
> 00000002 000000ff 00000003 000000ff
> ^ phys cpu id
> ^ distribution server
> ^ logical cpu id
> ^ distribution server
>
> Tested on POWER5 box.
>
> Since POWER4 does not have SMT, crash can happen on any CPU and kdump
> kernel can boot with "maxcpus=1" without any problem.
>
>
>
> Allow any cpu to become boot cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Kumar M <mohan@in.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Index: test/linux-2.6.19-rc3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> ===================================================================
> --- test.orig/linux-2.6.19-rc3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> +++ test/linux-2.6.19-rc3/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c
> @@ -687,7 +687,8 @@ void __init xics_init_IRQ(void)
> np;
> np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "cpu")) {
> ireg = get_property(np, "reg", &ilen);
> - if (ireg && ireg[0] == get_hard_smp_processor_id(boot_cpuid)) {
> + if (ireg && ((ireg[0] == get_hard_smp_processor_id(boot_cpuid))
> + || (ireg[0] == get_hard_smp_processor_id(boot_cpuid) - 1))) {
> ireg = get_property(np,
> "ibm,ppc-interrupt-gserver#s", &ilen);
> i = ilen / sizeof(int);
NAK
We can't assume any arithmetic relationship between the
"hard"/platform thread ids; it's completely unspecified. I bet this
patch happens to work on your system but will fail on others.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-30 18:04 [RFC] Fix for interrupt distribution Mohan Kumar M
2006-10-30 18:17 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-10-31 11:05 ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-06 22:46 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-11-16 12:56 ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-16 15:36 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-11-17 4:57 ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-17 12:12 ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-11-29 9:10 ` [PATCH] " Mohan Kumar M
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061030181751.GI17168@localdomain \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).