From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEAF67CE9 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:54:33 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:54:25 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Geoff Levand Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/16] powerpc: add support for ps3 platform Message-ID: <20061115175425.GA18856@lst.de> References: <4554DACB.8060809@am.sony.com> <20061110152310.7419ef3e@pb15> <4559099A.6060805@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4559099A.6060805@am.sony.com> Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:11:06PM -0800, Geoff Levand wrote: > > platform" which expands to "this is the ps3 platform platform"? ps3 is > > quite adequate as the platform name. :-) > > I had it as ps3, but I was told to change it to ps3pf. Who told you to use ps3pf? I think we should shoot that person for beein stupid. It's definitly not an acceptable name. I think the most sensible one for now is ps3hv, unless the rumoured cell based workstation from sony can share the port, in which case sonyhv would make a lot more sense.