From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:21:58 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Jimi Xenidis Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/16] hypervisor functions for Celleb Message-ID: <20061117052158.GB670@krispykreme> References: <200611150937.kAF9b305001499@toshiba.co.jp> <20061115183746.GC21633@lst.de> <200611152304.45243.arnd@arndb.de> <45AC8C44-8193-4311-B4BF-BF7FF56C8DF4@watson.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <45AC8C44-8193-4311-B4BF-BF7FF56C8DF4@watson.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Just make another one (or a set of them like the phyp calls) and > define then in assembly. > Certainly a bl to a function will be negligible to the hcall its self. Agreed. And I thought the phyp hcall code was ugly :) Any ideas why its so different? Just NIH? Anton