From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7F667C02 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:49:41 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:49:27 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [POWERPC] 8xx: generic 8xx code arch/powerpc port Message-ID: <20061117064927.GB15013@lst.de> References: <20061114012504.17455.13833.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20061114012816.17455.12059.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20061115182316.GA20719@lst.de> <1163717323.5940.407.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1163717323.5940.407.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: linuxppc-dev , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:48:43AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I think those 2 are used for cases where they either have a non-linear > mapping a-la Amiga/APUS or in cases where they try to get addresses of > things in the vmalloc area no ?. For vmalloc we should be using vmalloc_to_page and then page_to_phys, but again, I'd prefer to see the actual user before making detailed suggestions.