From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp107.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.206]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0124E67C67 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 07:02:13 +1100 (EST) From: David Brownell To: Alessandro Zummo Subject: Re: NTP time sync Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:55:23 -0800 References: <20061122203633.611acaa8@inspiron> In-Reply-To: <20061122203633.611acaa8@inspiron> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200611221155.26686.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , ralf@linux-mips.org, Andi Kleen , lethal@linux-sh.org, paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wednesday 22 November 2006 11:36 am, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > > wrto the in-kernel NTP synchronization, > as discussed before [1], my opinion > is that it should be done in userland. > > Keeping it in kernel implies subtle code > in each of the supported architectures. > > So, if the arch maintainers agree, > I would suggest to schedule it for removal. > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/28/358 Suggested time of removal: one year after two relevant software package releases get updated: - NTPD, to call hwclock specifying the relevant RTC; - util-linux, updating hwclock to know about /dev/rtcN; - busybox, with its own hwclock implementation. The util-linux hwclock update is already in the queue, I'm told. - Dave