[PATCH] ppc64_defconfig to use AUTOFS_V4 not V3

[PATCH] ppc64_defconfig to use AUTOFS_V4 not V3

[Linas Vepstas]

Paul,

Please apply. Although I have a general question: who is served
by the ppc64_defconfig these days? Any reason why its not more 
like powerpc_defcofig?  "make defconfig" uses uname -m to pick up
the defconfig, and my cell, rhel5 and sles10 boxes report ppc64 
not pseries for uname -m.  

--linas

Defconfig ppc64 kernels running under late-model distros
may hang in the automounter rc.d script, which seems to be
expecting autofs version 4. This patch uses the newer autofs.

Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>

----
 arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4-git3/arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4-git3.orig/arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig	2006-11-01 16:15:06.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4-git3/arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig	2006-11-29 11:53:48.000000000 -0600
@@ -1386,8 +1386,8 @@ CONFIG_INOTIFY=y
 CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER=y
 # CONFIG_QUOTA is not set
 CONFIG_DNOTIFY=y
-CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS=y
-# CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS is not set
+# CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS is not set
+CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS=m
 # CONFIG_FUSE_FS is not set
 
 #

Re: [PATCH] ppc64_defconfig to use AUTOFS_V4 not V3

[Olof Johansson]

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:05:22 -0600 linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) wrote:

> Please apply. Although I have a general question: who is served
> by the ppc64_defconfig these days? Any reason why its not more 
> like powerpc_defcofig?  "make defconfig" uses uname -m to pick up
> the defconfig, and my cell, rhel5 and sles10 boxes report ppc64 
> not pseries for uname -m.  

I like using it to build a kernel that runs on as much as possible with
a single image, but I don't think all platforms have been added there
(yet). Sort of like a superset of all other 64-bit configs.


-Olof

Re: [PATCH] ppc64_defconfig to use AUTOFS_V4 not V3

[Linas Vepstas]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:45:11PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:05:22 -0600 linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) wrote:
> 
> > Please apply. Although I have a general question: who is served
> > by the ppc64_defconfig these days? Any reason why its not more 
> > like powerpc_defcofig?  "make defconfig" uses uname -m to pick up
> > the defconfig, and my cell, rhel5 and sles10 boxes report ppc64 
> > not pseries for uname -m.  
> 
> I like using it to build a kernel that runs on as much as possible with
> a single image, but I don't think all platforms have been added there
> (yet). Sort of like a superset of all other 64-bit configs.

Ahh, well, in that case, I propsoe turning on the following as well.

CONFIG_USB_MON=y
CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m
CONFIG_JOLIET=y
CONFIG_ZISOFS=y
CONFIG_ZISOFS_FS=y
CONFIG_XMON_DEFAULT=y

and a few device drivers:
CONFIG_IXGB_NAPI=y
CONFIG_S2IO=m
CONFIG_S2IO_NAPI=y

I had mistook ppc64 as being subset-ish not superset-ish.

--linas