From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e36.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11C067BB6 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:32:32 +1100 (EST) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kATJWSrh009327 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:32:28 -0500 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id kATJWSFI535530 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:32:28 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kATJWSTJ029347 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:32:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:32:27 -0600 To: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64_defconfig to use AUTOFS_V4 not V3 Message-ID: <20061129193227.GO10879@austin.ibm.com> References: <20061129180522.GM10879@austin.ibm.com> <20061129124511.3be6b9a8@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20061129124511.3be6b9a8@localhost.localdomain> From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, nfonteno@us.ibm.com, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:45:11PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:05:22 -0600 linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) wrote: > > > Please apply. Although I have a general question: who is served > > by the ppc64_defconfig these days? Any reason why its not more > > like powerpc_defcofig? "make defconfig" uses uname -m to pick up > > the defconfig, and my cell, rhel5 and sles10 boxes report ppc64 > > not pseries for uname -m. > > I like using it to build a kernel that runs on as much as possible with > a single image, but I don't think all platforms have been added there > (yet). Sort of like a superset of all other 64-bit configs. Ahh, well, in that case, I propsoe turning on the following as well. CONFIG_USB_MON=y CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m CONFIG_JOLIET=y CONFIG_ZISOFS=y CONFIG_ZISOFS_FS=y CONFIG_XMON_DEFAULT=y and a few device drivers: CONFIG_IXGB_NAPI=y CONFIG_S2IO=m CONFIG_S2IO_NAPI=y I had mistook ppc64 as being subset-ish not superset-ish. --linas