From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (unknown [81.2.110.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E6067C10 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 23:58:25 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:02:54 +0000 From: Alan To: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] add delay around sl82c105_reset_engine calls Message-ID: <20061204130254.424c7979@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20061204124026.GB28159@aepfle.de> References: <20061130165202.GA23205@aepfle.de> <20061204124026.GB28159@aepfle.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 13:40:26 +0100 (MET) Olaf Hering wrote: > > > the hald media changed polling does really confuse things. > noone knows why the delays are needed, but they give us access to > the CD. Can you tell me what happens if you completely pull the reset out of the dma_end function. Do you still need delays then.