linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dwalker@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in	latency_trace.c (take 3)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:23:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061204162300.GA23800@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45744AF5.2040508@ru.mvista.com>



* Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:

> > 	/* check for buggy clocks, handling wrap for 32-bit clocks */
> >-	if (TYPE_EQUAL(cycles_t, unsigned long)) {
> >+	if (TYPE_EQUAL(cycle_t, unsigned long)) {
> > 		if (time_after((unsigned long)T1, (unsigned long)T2))
> > 			printk("bug: %08lx < %08lx!\n",
> > 				(unsigned long)T2, (unsigned long)T1);
> 
>    This earlier fix by Kevin woulnd't have sense anymore with cycle_t...

yeah, indeed - i've zapped this one too.

basically, what i'd like is the 32-bit clocks/cycles be handled 
intelligently, and not adding to the cruft that already is in 
kernel/latency_tracing.c.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-04 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-13 19:52 [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency_trace.c (take 3) Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-03 19:33 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-04  9:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-04 12:29     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-04 15:39       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-04 16:21         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-04 16:23           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-12-04 17:09             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-04 21:56         ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-04 21:58           ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-04 18:04       ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061204162300.GA23800@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).