From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC87679E0 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:05:38 +1100 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [patch] powerpc: add scanning of ebc bus to of_platform Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:01:36 +0100 References: <20061208114113.2191e446@localhost> <17788.49546.390921.608302@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1165820168.7260.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1165820168.7260.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200612111101.37629.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Christian Krafft List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 11 December 2006 07:56, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >=20 > > an ack or a nack for the patch? =A0Sounds like a nack to me, > > but I'm not sure. :) >=20 > Put it in for now. >=20 Yes, definitely. I was not objecting to Christian's patch anyway, but to Ben's idea of getting rid of that part of the code, which is a side-discussion. Arnd <><