From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A90867C8A for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:36:27 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:36:12 +0300 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Paul Mackerras Subject: [PATCH 0/4] CPM-related stuff resubmit Message-ID: <20061212013612.18725c25@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_C0IBf33zh0u9dCgPNkFOl7b; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Sig_C0IBf33zh0u9dCgPNkFOl7b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul, Resubmit with proper Sign-off follows. Those fixes are more or less independent by sense, but here they are in order I applied them to prevent = confusion. Fs_enet patch, as usual, included as reference and to represent a full pict= ure, and will be sent=20 over to netdev.=20 They were applied after the 8xx series in my tree, and though I haven't val= idated each one for self-sufficiency, they play nicely in a row. I don't think they'll confuse = because of linus' merge=20 either, if so, let me know and I'll do a rebase. -- Thanks, Vitaly --Sig_C0IBf33zh0u9dCgPNkFOl7b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFfd1duOg9JvQhSEsRAkzEAJ4uiVFBu5pjrMJLnQXfqDox0aZisQCgkKSE S+OhpZdf9spy48Xan3X1hCM= =GdFK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_C0IBf33zh0u9dCgPNkFOl7b--