From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: consolidate mpc83xx platform files
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:51:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061212165139.575d059a.kim.phillips@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165963479.11914.98.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:44:38 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > well it depends on what you do with the _probe()s. If you have multiple define_machine definitions built in, the generic probe will always succeed to match on the first machine probe_machine() tests, which may or may not be the machine it's currently running on.
>
> Which is an argument for _NOT_ doing a generic probe !
>
> Ben.
>
>
correct, not doing a generic probe with a file per board (if all it has is the ppc_md/ define_machine() in it), is bad. It needs to be accompanied with its _probe(). Isn't that what the question was?
Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-12 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-09 1:07 [PATCH] powerpc: consolidate mpc83xx platform files Kim Phillips
2006-12-09 7:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-11 3:41 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-11 21:51 ` Kim Phillips
2006-12-11 22:08 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-12 2:10 ` Kim Phillips
2006-12-12 2:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-12 2:31 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-12 21:30 ` Scott Wood
2006-12-12 21:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-12 22:06 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-12 22:24 ` Kim Phillips
2006-12-12 22:28 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-12 22:38 ` Kim Phillips
2006-12-12 22:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-12 22:51 ` Kim Phillips [this message]
2006-12-12 22:40 ` Scott Wood
2006-12-13 0:23 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-13 5:25 ` Geoff Thorpe
2006-12-13 6:07 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-13 17:48 ` Geoff Thorpe
2006-12-13 18:21 ` Kim Phillips
2006-12-13 21:13 ` Dan Malek
2006-12-12 22:03 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-12 22:41 ` Scott Wood
2006-12-12 22:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-13 0:20 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-18 5:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18 17:04 ` Kumar Gala
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-12 17:36 Kim Phillips
2006-12-12 18:03 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-14 1:04 Kim Phillips
2006-12-15 16:09 ` Kumar Gala
2006-12-15 17:23 ` Dan Malek
2006-12-18 21:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-15 17:59 ` Olof Johansson
2006-12-16 1:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2006-12-18 21:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-18 21:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-18 14:44 Joakim Tjernlund
2006-12-18 16:51 ` Olof Johansson
2006-12-19 21:30 Kim Phillips
2006-12-19 22:19 ` Ben Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061212165139.575d059a.kim.phillips@freescale.com \
--to=kim.phillips@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).