linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@gmx.de>,
	jgarzik@pobox.com, James K Lewis <jim@jklewis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] Spidernet Avoid possible RX chain corruption
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:15:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061214171511.GT4329@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1166055763.6838.5.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:22:43AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >  	spider_net_refill_rx_chain(card);
> > -	spider_net_enable_rxchtails(card);
> >  	spider_net_enable_rxdmac(card);
> >  	return 0;
> 
> Didn't you just add that line?

Dagnabbit. The earlier pach was moving around existing code.
Or, more precisely, trying to maintain the general function
of the old code even while moving things around.

Later on, when I started looking at what the danged function 
actually did, and the context it was in, I realized that it 
was a bad idea to call the thing.  So then I removed it. :-/

How should I handle this proceedurally? Resend the patch sequence? 
Let it slide?

--linas

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-14 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-13 21:00 [PATCH 0/14]: Spidernet RX-side patches Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:06 ` [PATCH 1/14] Spidernet DMA coalescing Linas Vepstas
2006-12-14 11:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-14 17:07     ` Linas Vepstas
2006-12-14 17:35       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-14 19:38         ` Revised: " Linas Vepstas
2006-12-26 21:09   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-13 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/14] Spidernet add net_ratelimit to suppress long output Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 23:31   ` Michael Ellerman
2006-12-14  6:13     ` Jim Lewis
2006-12-13 21:10 ` [PATCH 3/14] Spidernet remove rxramfull tasklet Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:12 ` [PATCH 4/14] Spidernet cleanup un-needed API Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:15 ` [PATCH 5/14] Spidernet RX skb mem leak Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:16 ` [PATCH 6/14] Spidernet another " Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:17 ` [PATCH 7/14] Spidernet Cleanup return codes Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:18 ` [PATCH 8/14] Spidernet RX Refill Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:19 ` [PATCH 9/14] Spidernet Remove unused variable Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:20 ` [PATCH 10/14] Spidernet RX Chain tail Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:22 ` [PATCH 11/14] Spidernet Memory barrier Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:23 ` [PATCH 12/14] Spidernet Avoid possible RX chain corruption Linas Vepstas
2006-12-14  0:22   ` Michael Ellerman
2006-12-14 17:15     ` Linas Vepstas [this message]
2006-12-14 17:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-15  1:48       ` Michael Ellerman
2006-12-13 21:23 ` [PATCH 13/14] Spidernet RX Debugging printout Linas Vepstas
2006-12-13 21:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] Spidernet Rework RX linked list Linas Vepstas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061214171511.GT4329@austin.ibm.com \
    --to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=Jens.Osterkamp@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=jim@jklewis.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).