From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.suse.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972D8DDEC9 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:57:07 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:56:24 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc4 Message-ID: <20070109005624.GA598@suse.de> References: <200701081550.27748.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> <45A25C17.5070606@246tNt.com> <1168303139.22458.246.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1168303139.22458.246.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: Sylvain Munaut , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Mariusz Kozlowski , paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:38:59AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 15:58 +0100, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > > Don't build ohci as module for now. > > A fix for that is already in gregkh usb tree for 2.6.21 > > Do you mean that as-is, powerpc defconfigs cannot build USB as a module > in 2.6.20 ? That is unacceptable as a regression. We need a fix in > 2.6.20. > > Greg, what is the status there ? Hm, for some reason I thought your patches were not needed until 2.6.21. Should I forward them on to Linus now for 2.6.20? Are they required for ppc to build? thanks, greg k-h