From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <> Received: from asclepius.site5.com (asclepius.site5.com [70.47.36.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65905DDEDA for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:46:08 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:42:50 -0500 From: Sonny Rao To: Adam Litke Subject: Re: 2.6.19: kernel BUG in hugepd_page at arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:58! Message-ID: <20070112204250.GA2290@kevlar.boston.burdell.org> References: <20070112195703.GA1826@kevlar.boston.burdell.org> <1168632510.12413.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1168632510.12413.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, nacc@us.ibm.com, dwg@au1.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:08:30PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 14:57 -0500, Sonny Rao wrote: > > (Apologies if this is a re-post) > > > > Hi, I was running 2.6.19 and running some benchmarks using > > libhugetlbfs (1.0.1) and I can fairly reliably trigger this bug: > > Is this triggered by a libhugetlbfs test case? If so, which one? Ok so the testsuite all passed except for "slbpacaflush" which said "PASS (inconclusive)" ... not sure if that is expected or not.