From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88849DE14A for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:25:29 +1100 (EST) Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:25:27 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070128.152527.74749301.davem@davemloft.net> To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/16] Ops based MSI Implementation From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1170015292.26655.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1169971963.19887.15.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1170015292.26655.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: greg@kroah.com, kyle@parisc-linux.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, brice@myri.com, shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, ebiederm@xmission.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:14:52 +1100 > > Which should be good enough to handle everything but RTAS. > > You keep ignoring the problem then... we -HAVE- to handle the RTAS case. > In addition, it's not unlikely that other virtualized environment will > provide a similar very high level APIs to MSIs. I believe sparc64 has similar issues to RTAS fwiw.