From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from colo.lackof.org (colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.lackof.org", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF54FDDFC4 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:03:58 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:03:46 -0700 From: Grant Grundler To: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/16] Abstract MSI suspend Message-ID: <20070129220346.GA6630@colo.lackof.org> References: <20070125083410.631EEDE277@ozlabs.org> <1170055377.19887.60.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1170064058.19887.78.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070129165217.GA10992@colo.lackof.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Grant Grundler , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kyle McMartin , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "David S. Miller" , Brice Goglin List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:57:53AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > laptops now come with 1000BT chips that _do_ support MSI-X. > > Really? Which gigE chips are using MSI-X (as opposed to MSI)? Sorry, I was thinking MSI (not MSI-X). The point was that MSI will need suspend/resume support. > (I am using MSI with e1000 on my laptop, but I've not seen any NICs > other than 10-gigE NICs that even have an MSI-X capability -- none of > the e1000, tg3 or bnx2 devices I have around have it at least) yes - same here. gige NICs don't need MSI-X if they can use MSI. thanks, grant > - R.