From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (fed1rmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.241.34]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7FDDDF26 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:39:28 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:17:36 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic RTC support for PPC Message-ID: <20070130051736.GH28746@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20070125073754.GA10004@lixom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070125073754.GA10004@lixom.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, kimphill@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:37:54AM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote: > Make the PPC RTC functions use the generic RTC infrastructure if they > are not already defined (and an RTC is registered in the system). > > This should make it possible to remove the hideous direct access used > in some of the 83xx platforms. Now, I know I'm a bit late, and I've been quiet of late, but, um, why is there anything other than the RTC class stuff being used? I know drivers/char/genrtc.c isn't gone yet, but really, it should be in the process of being phased out. IMHO, it should depend on !POWERPC (or whatever the magic is to allow arch/ppc && !arch/powerpc). -- Tom Rini