From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75F4DDF6E for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:22 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:15:19 +0300 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [POWERPC] Fix kernel build errors for mpc8272ads and mpc8560ads Message-ID: <20070131081519.6af307ce@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20C6E81C-CB34-461A-B1CD-FF302D83E2AB@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20070130230711.21111.52924.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070130230859.21111.39370.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070131073947.67520c16@localhost.localdomain> <20C6E81C-CB34-461A-B1CD-FF302D83E2AB@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_8wqpg31hvS9scqa/yQpp+P6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: linuxppc-dev , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Sig_8wqpg31hvS9scqa/yQpp+P6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:41:57 -0600 Kumar Gala wrote: >=20 > On Jan 30, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:41:14 -0600 > > Kumar Gala wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Recent update of asm-powerpc/io.h caused cpm-related stuff to > >>> break in the > >>> current kernel. Current patch fixes it, as well as other > >>> inconsistencies > >>> expressed, that do not permit targets from working properly: > >>> > >>> - Updated dts with a chosen node with interrupt controller, > >> > >> Why do we need this? I'm not aware of any other boards having to > >> set this? > > > > Correct. In fact I dropped that change, after "dtc -f" discussion =20 > > but forgot > > to clear this line from desc. Will resend in a few minutes, thanks =20 > > for pointing it out. >=20 > I think the 8272 dts still had the node in it. >=20 No it does not, in the latest resubmit series at least - just have checked. -- Sincerely, Vitaly --Sig_8wqpg31hvS9scqa/yQpp+P6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFwCXouOg9JvQhSEsRAjNxAJ483LKwcIU7bHwzogdW0A2fZzRKtgCeLjQK +5lkwY2nbX80MwmDDiq+5aM= =Umx7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_8wqpg31hvS9scqa/yQpp+P6--