From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3DBDDE2D for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:48:06 +1100 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so147160ugf for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:48:04 -0800 (PST) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH] use winbond libata instead of ide driver for pseries CD drives Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:53:54 +0100 References: <20070210203512.GA25586@aepfle.de> <20070216092046.GA2572@aepfle.de> <45D5B720.4010308@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <45D5B720.4010308@ru.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200702161553.54550.bzolnier@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton , Olaf Hering , Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackeras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 16 February 2007 14:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > I'm sorry, how those 2 drivers can be equivalent?! The pata_winbond driver > is for VLB only, sl81c105 was for PCI only -- you certainly want to use > pata_sl82c105 (indeed better version of sl82c105 driver). I was under the impression that with your fixes these drivers (sl82c105 and pata_sl82c105) are functionally equivalent. Did I miss something (i.e. some patches)? Bart