From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e33.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC6BDDD08 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:19:24 +1100 (EST) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1GGIf8x002110 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:18:41 -0500 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l1GGJIYk544100 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:19:18 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l1GGJIRV006856 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:19:18 -0700 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:19:17 -0600 To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12]: sungem_phy: support bcm5461 phy, autoneg. Message-ID: <20070216161917.GD923@austin.ibm.com> References: <200701260724.l0Q7OISY027645@toshiba.co.jp> <20070216001857.GC923@austin.ibm.com> <20070216004325.GA8192@austin.ibm.com> <200702161546.31765.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200702161546.31765.arnd@arndb.de> From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:46:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 16 February 2007 01:43, Linas Vepstas wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jens Osterkamp > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas > > You only have the Signed-off-by information here and in the other > patches, but no 'From:' line. > > I assume that Jeff uses the git-applymbox tool to import > mails, in which case the first line of the patch description > should be 'From: Someone Else ', unless you > are the author of the patch yourself. Ahh. OK. I was assuming it was the first signed-off-by that counted. --linas