From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB39DDDED for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:22:51 +1100 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: What happened to include/asm-ppc?? Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:22:23 +0100 References: <32201137.34111171657512254.JavaMail.root@vms061.mailsrvcs.net> <200702162150.44997.arnd@arndb.de> <45D632F3.3000509@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <45D632F3.3000509@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200702170022.24595.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 16 February 2007 23:40, Timur Tabi wrote: > > That shouldn't be the case, the headers from asm-powerpc should be > > sufficient for all 32 and 64 bit user apps, if not then you should > > really report that as a bug. > > I thought applications weren't supposed to include kernel header files? > Right, but glibc depends on them. We now have a mechanism of installing a subset of the kernel headers with 'make headers_install' in order to be used by glibc. This currently will install a set of the asm-powerpc files, but we got rid of all user dependencies on asm-ppc headers. Arnd <><