From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org (smtp.osdl.org [65.172.181.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.osdl.org", Issuer "OSDL Hostmaster" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD121DDDF0 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:21:00 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:20:47 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 (final?)] ps3fb: thread updates Message-Id: <20070221152047.0d3da74c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20070215152301.573853000@sonycom.com> <20070215152432.264415000@sonycom.com> <20070215175007.GA10817@lst.de> <1171575817.5644.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070215165916.de546f0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070216163811.GB32051@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Linux/PPC Development , Linux Frame Buffer Device Development List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:42:04 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > ps3fb: Replace the kernel_thread and the semaphore by a proper kthread, which is > simply woken up when the screen must be updated diff -puN drivers/video/ps3fb.c~ps3fb-thread-updates-2 drivers/video/ps3fb.c --- a/drivers/video/ps3fb.c~ps3fb-thread-updates-2 +++ a/drivers/video/ps3fb.c @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include @@ -808,16 +807,13 @@ static int ps3fb_ioctl(struct fb_info *i static int ps3fbd(void *arg) { - DEFINE_WAIT(wait); - DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(wq); - while (!kthread_should_stop()) { - prepare_to_wait(&wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - if (!ps3fb.is_kicked) - schedule(); - finish_wait(&wq, &wait); - ps3fb.is_kicked = 0; - ps3fb_sync(0); /* single buffer */ + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + if (ps3fb.is_kicked) { + ps3fb.is_kicked = 0; + ps3fb_sync(0); /* single buffer */ + } + schedule(); } return 0; } _ There's still no try_to_freeze() in there. Shouldn't we have one?