From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.95]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A2DCDDE2B for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:24:55 +1100 (EST) From: David Brownell To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Subject: Re: several messages Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:15:01 -0800 References: <200702211929.17203.david-b@pacbell.net> <200702211950.22422.david-b@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200702221715.03195.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: Alessandro Zummo , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, john stultz , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel list , Torrance , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , Johannes Berg List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 22 February 2007 2:58 pm, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > I think, we only want 1, right? And the latter seems to be more generic / > platform independent? And as a side-effect, powermac would have to migrate > to generic rtc:-) I'd certainly think that restoring the system clock should be, as much as possible, in platform-agnostic code. Like the generic RTC framework. And hmm, that powermac/time.c file replicates other RTC code... Minor obstacle: removing the EXPERIMENTAL label from that code. - Dave