From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:38:01 +1100 From: David Gibson To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 Subject: Re: [RFC] powerpc: Document new property called interrupt-parents Message-ID: <20070228233801.GC3048@localhost.localdomain> References: <200702272254.l1RMsjt2030709@ld0164-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070228005615.GE11775@localhost.localdomain> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302AA071F@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302AA071F@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:56:55AM -0700, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Gibson [mailto:david@gibson.dropbear.id.au] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:56 PM > > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > > Cc: paulus@samba.org; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > > Subject: Re: [RFC] powerpc: Document new property called > > interrupt-parents > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:54:45PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > > > > > Document new property called interrupt-parents which can > > > be used to represent interrupts for devices that route > > > interrupts to more than one interrupt controller. > > > > Well, whatever Segher says, I'm still very concerned about the > > potential for extra difficulty in debugging with this approach. > > The issue, as I understand it, is the potential for an old > kernel parser to silently misparse a new dev tree with this > new property. > > Do the version and last_comp_version in the blob header > help here? Unfortunately not. Those fields version the the serialization format of the device tree, not the content of the device tree. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson