From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zipcode.az.mvista.com (unknown [65.200.49.156]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DBDDDF59 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:53:21 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:53:45 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" To: Jerry Van Baren Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFA & Update: Using libfdt in u-boot for fdt command Message-ID: <20070302205345.GC20441@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <45E6DCB4.3080106@smiths-aerospace.com> <20070301234951.GC8177@mag.az.mvista.com> <45E77B1B.5060509@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <45E77B1B.5060509@comcast.net> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:17:15PM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Mark A. Greer wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:01:24AM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > >>Hi all, > >> > >>This is a Request for Advice. > > > >Hi Jerry. > > > >One minor thing. I'd just want to remind you that we shouldn't stray > >too far from the OF interface. The bootwrapper code sits on top of > >either the FDT access interface or the true OF DT access interface. > >The closer we keep the two, the cleaner & easier the we can keep > >the bootwrapper code. > > > >Mark > > Hi Mark, > > Understood, but that isn't really my battle. Hi Jerry, Yeah, I know. I didn't word my msg very well. I was really making a general stmt/reminder and not directing it to you specifically. I should have made that clearer in my msg tho. Sorry. Mark