From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (e4.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e4.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4576DDDF8A for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:10:59 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l279AsdG002588 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:10:54 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l279Arvo270686 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:10:53 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l279Ar52012928 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:10:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:40:26 +0530 From: Mohan Kumar M To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970 Message-ID: <20070307091026.GJ7476@in.ibm.com> References: <20061208045537.GA14626@in.ibm.com> <17798.6928.378248.28903@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20061218105706.GB3911@in.ibm.com> <20070306135754.GB7476@in.ibm.com> <20070306220546.GI24926@localdomain> <1173257567.9349.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1173257567.9349.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: ppcdev , Nathan Lynch , Paul Mackerras , fastboot@lists.osdl.org Reply-To: mohan@in.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 16:05 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote: > > Was the root cause of this problem ever determined? It sure looked > > like a firmware or hardware problem since it's known to occur only on > > JS20. > > js20 and js21 have in common that the firmware "emulates" the XICS on > top of an MPIC, which can cause interesting issues ... like the > requirement of issuing EOI's from the CPU that got the interrupt, among > ohters. > There is no interrupt missing problems in JS21. Only JS20 boxes face this problem. The only difference between JS20 and JS21 is that JS20 does not have Global Interrupt Queue while JS21 has GIQ. Regards, Mohan.