From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (caramon.arm.linux.org.uk [217.147.92.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1C2DDE9E for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:43:55 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:43:40 +0000 From: Russell King To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls. Message-ID: <20070309084340.GA29959@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1173394873.3461.510.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1173394873.3461.510.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Sender: Russell King Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:01:13PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > Most system calls seem to get added to i386 first. This patch > automatically generates a warning for any new system call which is > implemented on i386 but not the architecture currently being compiled. > On PowerPC at the moment, for example, it results in these warnings: > init/missing_syscalls.h:935:3: warning: #warning syscall sync_file_range not implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:947:3: warning: #warning syscall getcpu not implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:950:3: warning: #warning syscall epoll_pwait not implemented > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse You might also like to add: Signed-off-by: Russell King since I did resolve the issues with getting a sed expression which did the right thing, rather than your for loop, awk, echo, and providing a way to ignore the lack of certain syscall numbers... -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: