From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.suse.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C68DDE9F for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:54:46 +1100 (EST) From: Andi Kleen To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Complain about missing system calls. Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:54:13 +0100 References: <1173394873.3461.510.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1173458854.24454.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1173458854.24454.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200703091954.13982.ak@suse.de> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Woodhouse , rmk@arm.linux.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > We need additional gunk for syscalls that can be called from SPEs on > cell Can that gunk not be auto generated? I know s390 does in some cases, but it looks quite auto generatable to me. -Andi >